Hi Mike,Re: Ease-of-use - Suggest you write separate pieces for A2.1 and A2.2's EoU, and link to those as needed. These are baselines, and if the pad uses a proprietary UI, then note any difference from the baseline UI.Re: Battery life - Suggest you do full run-down test and not rely on battery indicators as those are notoriously unreliable. Tests should be automated and standardized to minimize variance. The one use w/o requiring wifi is e-reading, so a no-wifi test, if done, should concentrate on that.One consideration often ignored is support. It's important considering that many of these things will come out of the oven not fully baked. Support here doesn't mean customer support in the traditional sense, but things such as online support availability, and the responsiveness of peers or staff to resolve issues.There's a need for a point system, simply because it's a good shortcut on the assessed quality. But because many of the categories you cite have no quantifiable metric (eg quality, value), I'd suggest keeping it simple and have one score for the whole thing. Let's face it, other than the quantifiable stuff, scoring is all a fudge anyway. KISS.Lastly, consider your audience. If you are US-based, stick to tablets available to US users (read: skip the offshore stuff). Ditto if you're EU or AU-based. Other regions will have their own coverage. Don't try to be everything to everybody.Good luck.HP