Depends upon whether Google decides to allow tablets to acquire licensing or not. I skimmed the licensing a bit, and it appears that they have a "free" license of some type as well as paid, however I suspect that Augen's would have to be the paid variety as I suspect the "free" ones are geared to phones where they'd be more likely to see Google advertising, etc. all of the time while I imagine many tablet users won't cruise around wireless networks as often, especially the 3G less ones. Possibly the phones also get licensing by subsidies of the network providers, which is why the handsets are relatively cheap for their specs, as they more than get the $$$ back in the 2y required contracts for the discounts.AFAIK Google had no intention to truly address Android tablets, etc. i.e. non-phones until Android 3.0. I wouldn't be surprised if their management were almost entirely unaware of the proliferation of Chinese Android tablets until the GT hit kmart. i.e. Archos is small time, PDN is billed as an "ereader"(which just happens to be highy hackable), etc. so the GT was the first to tablet to hit a large retail chain AS a tablet.So in the end it comes down to will Google allow tablets NOW to access the market, andif so can they get a "free" license or will they have to pay for one. I suspect if they have to pay Augen will stick with the alternative market providers, as there probably isn't much profit in their business ATM, and with other tablets available they can't really afford to pass on the license pricing, i.e. going to say $179.99 would make the A81-E SUPER attractive, more than my kinda wish that I could talk myself into $75 more for something that I may hate v. $150ish that I can refund. (Did Augen ever sell anything else? I'd never heard of them until the GT...)(Gah! This talking is almost making me consider the uber cheap PDN again then I'd be out even less and still could refund it... I think... (don't usually shop kohls for electronics, or BBB at all so no idea on their return policies ATM.))