[DarthJabba]

Having read the benchmarks of the Wopad i7, I have decided to post my own benchmarks of my Teclast A15 (running the stock Gingerbread 2.3.1, kernel version 2.6.32.27).

Anyone comparing these benchmarks with those posted for the Wopad i7 should note that the Wopad was running at a screen resolution of 800x840, while the Teclast is running at a screen resolution of 1280x800. This difference in screen resolution has a quite significant impact on the results, and should be borne in mind when interpreting the benchmark data.

AnTutu v2.7.3:
Total: 2151
RAM: 389
CPU int: 556
CPU float: 130
2D graphics: 146
3D graphics: 419
Database IO: 255
SD card write: 5.5mb/s 55
SD card read: >50mb/s 201
CPU freq: 1008mhz

Quadrant Standard v2.0:
Total: 1442
CPU: 1306
Mem: 2745
I/O: 2038
2D: 196
3D: 927

Vellamo v1.0.6: 800

An3dBench: (1280 x 800)
Fillrate ST/MT: 58.09/45.52 MP/sec
High object count: 17.95fps
Multiple lights: 43.41fps
High polygon count: 29.25fps
Keyframe animation: 59.71fps
Game level: 22.91fps
Total: 4709

An3dBench XL: (1280 x 760)
Double dragon: 25.31 fps
Flower power: 15.12 fps
Ninja's garden: 7.69 fps
Emperor's new clothes: 31.68 fps
Magic island: 12.90 fps
Total score: 16051

GLBenchmark v2.1.4 (1280 x 800)
Egypt standard: 12 FPS (1391 frames)
Egypt high: 6 FPS (635 frames)
Pro standard: 20 FPS (1022 frames)
Pro high: 6 FPS (311frames)

CF Bench v1.1:
Native: 3741
Java: 1242
Overall: 2241

Nenamark2 v2.2: 15.1 fps

Neocore: 20.4fps

Linpack v1.2.8 (MFLOPS): 15.732

 

[DarthJabba]

I bought a non-descript, el cheapo (£44 incl.) 7" tablet running ICS 4.0.3. It is described as "Processor: Allwinner-A10 1.5GHz Multi Core + Mali-400 GPU @350MHZ" (but the cpu is only running at 1GHZ, and the screen is at a resolution of 800*480). Various tools identity it as an "A710".

I was surprised to see that it beat the Teclast A15 hands down in almost all of these benchmarks. I am not sure whether this is due to the better optimisation of ICS, or the fact that the A710 is running at a screen resolution of 800*480, or whether the Allwinner+Mali-400 combination is simply better than the RK2918+GC800 combination, or a mixture of all of these!

Anyone care to comment on the capabilities of the Teclast hardware?

Anyway, here are the benchmarks for the Chinese "A710" 7inch tablet (with Teclast A15 results in square brackets for comparison):

AnTutu v2.7.3:
Total: 2954 [2151]
RAM: 396 [389]
CPU int: 622 [556]
CPU float: 161 [130]
2D graphics: 293 [146]
3D graphics: 1054 [419]
Database IO: 235 [255]
SD card write: 5.1mb/s 51 [5.5/55]
SD card read: 14.2MB/s 142 [>50/201]
CPU freq: 1008mhz [1008]

Quadrant Standard v2.0:
Total: 1593 [1442]
CPU: 1447 [1306]
Mem: 1437 [2745]
I/O: 3238 [2038]
2D: 242 [196]
3D: 1599 [927]

Vellamo v1.0.6: 754 [800]

An3dBench: (480 x 800)
Fillrate ST/MT: 10.24/10.24 MP/sec [58.09/45.52]
High object count: 26.42 fps [17.95]
Multiple lights: 59.72 fps [43.41]
High polygon count: 58.58 fps [29.25]
Keyframe animation: 59.74 fps [59.71]
Game level: 59.51 fps [22.91]
Total score: 7080 [4709]

An3dBench XL: (480 x 800)
Double dragon: 29.01 fps [25.31]
Flower power: 18.87 fps [15.12]
Ninja's garden: 14.47 fps [7.69]
Emperor's new clothes: 42.33 fps [31.68]
Magic island: 27.49 fps [12.90]
Total score: 22886 [16051]

GLBenchmark v2.1.4 (480 x 800)
Egypt standard: 36 FPS (4065 frames) [12/1391]
Egypt high: 33 FPS (3749 frames) [6/635]
Pro standard: 55 FPS (2736 frames) [20/1022]
Pro high: 53 FPS (2645 frames) [6/311]

Nenamark2 v2.2: 30.21 fps [15.1]

Neocore: 57.1.4fps [20.4]

Linpack v1.2.8 (MFLOPS): 15.092 [15.732]

 

[ratto]

Here are the Antut results for Teclast A15 ICS fresh installed:

worse than ever

seems to be not optimized

AnTutu v2.7.3:
Total: 2008
RAM: 371
CPU int: 531
CPU float: 131
2D graphics: 110
3D graphics: 383
Database IO: 195
SD card write: 85
SD card read: 202
CPU freq: 1008mhz [1008]

 

[DarthJabba]

That's disappointing