Specs-wise, the two are fairly evenly matched. The A43 has the larger display and almost as high a resolution, which is important for text legibility when web browsing. The Touch has more responsive navigation thanks to its mutitouch capacitive screen. The A43 has better AV codec support and better I/O (uSD, USB, HDMI). The Touch has a (much) larger app store, and larger built-in storage options. The Touch has the front cam for vid conf w/ other iPods. The A43 is slightly ($29) cheaper at the base price.But honestly, I don't think going by specs is an accurate evaluation. The real consideration is still "do you want to live in Apple's walled garden?" and that hasn't changed with the new releases. The new Touch is substantially improved over the old, and will sell boatloads just as with the old model, while the A43 is the first Android device (hopefully, not the only) that matches well against the Touch. Android users will get the A43, and Apple users will get the Touch.What's interesting about the new iPod lineup is the dumbing down of the Nano (smaller display, no cam, no video). I suspect it's to establish a clearer segmentation between the Nano and Touch: the Nano is now strictly music, and the Touch is for video and web/apps. It also signals Apple's de-emphasizing the DAP/PMP as standalone devices, and instead being subsumed in the more comprehensive (and more expensive) "connected" theme.